Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But i see nothing wrong with this headline. I think shes beautiful. Hollywood deals with the sexy, and she is obviously sexy.
We cant be apart of hollywood, if we are gonna be overly sensitve. If she’s showing cleavage, then gosh damnit, shes showing cleavage. If you see a problem with the head line, then youre over analyzing it. Her hair is dope as hell too.
Um…that really wasn’t the issue at all but thanks? The issue is not…does she look good. HELL YES she looks good. That is not even a little bit of the problem with the headline. When does it STOP being “Over sensitive” and START being a problem worthy of discussion? I am disturbed by your entire comment.
Maybe people will see an issue if they look at all the headlines for the night,
…and BOOM goes the dynamite. Thank you for this.
See any differences?
(Source: ancestryinprogress)
seriously? yet when natalie portman chopped her hair and appeared at the oscars a few years ago, it was a “cute”
violent—-delights:
Personally, I didn’t like the dress. I don’t think it’s “Oscar worthy”. There was nothing wrong with cleavage, I mean...
One of the most amazing actresses out right now, and she was ROCKIN’ that dress/hairstyle last night.
Wow…just Wow… What a headline for someone who’s been nominated as best actress at the Oscars… racismschool:
She is fucking gorgeous. Bitches can go eat a bag of dicks. F’real.